Courtesy Google Images |
By issuing the depredation permit to a private citizen to “take” i.e. kill the mountain lion known as P-45, the Department of Fish and Game, (trying to change their image by renaming themselves Fish and Wildlife) has circumvented the law and permitted a citizen to do that which the Department itself cannot do.
After the massacre of the lion cub that wandered into Santa
Monica, against the landscape of a genetic dearth of diverse male lions, and because
mountain lions are legally protected, the law was changed.
Fish and Game Code 4801.5 entitled “Removal or Taking of
Mountain Lion Not Designated as Threat to Public Health or Safety” was enacted
to mandate that nonlethal procedures shall be used to take a mountain lion
unless there is an imminent threat to a person and not specifically the
responders. The law also allows the Department to authorize qualified
individuals to use these nonlethal measures on their behalf. Unfortunately, the
law still allows anyone who suffered livestock or property damage by a mountain
lion to request a permit to take a mountain lion.
If the Department itself can’t use lethal force to remove a
mountain lion that is not threatening people, why would they grant a request to
any person trained or untrained to use lethal force when there is no such
threat? Are they not circumventing the point of the law which is that mountain
lions are legally protected and the Department must so protect them,
specifically, keep them alive?
I mourn the loss of the alpacas as well. But those keeping
animals must take steps to protect them from reasonably foreseeable dangers
including known predators. Killing the lion doesn’t make the rest of the
alpacas safer, it just kills the lion.
As for the Department, they need to start protecting the
wildlife under their purview rather than treating them like hunting game and
assist people in protecting their livestock rather than automatically granting
depredation permits. Then their name change will mean something.
P.S. - After a great deal of protest the owner of the alpacas has decided not to pursue killing the lion. It does not, however change the fact that Fish and Game needs to rethink its actions.
P.S. - After a great deal of protest the owner of the alpacas has decided not to pursue killing the lion. It does not, however change the fact that Fish and Game needs to rethink its actions.
No comments:
Post a Comment