President Obama claims to not want to solve the nation’s
financial crisis on the “backs of the needy”. Yet by cutting allowable
contributions to charity, through his new jobs bill, he will do precisely that.
Who does President Obama think is reliant upon non-profits if not the “needy”?
The new jobs bill will reduce the percentage of income that
donors can write off for charitable gifts and will limit tax breaks for such
gifts.
spcaLA officer responding to devastation after Katrina |
Government spending on social programs is shrinking,
Americans dropping to the poverty level is increasing, unemployment is rising,
and disposable income left to donate to a charity is nil. To reduce philanthropic gifts to the
not-for-profit sector is counter-intuitive.
In other words, non-profits are needed now, more than ever.
As a former community organizer, Obama must know that in
horrid economic times, philanthropic entities are filling the gaps left by the
government and the for-profit sector. If
charities collapse, there will be no relief for those dependent upon our
services. Non-profits are businesses
too. We provide jobs (we are hiring
now!), resources, and services that allow a community to thrive. We are the safety net that cushions the fall
when the government and all else fails.
At its inception in 1877, spcaLA was responsible for
protecting women, children and animals as they were legally considered
property, and as such abused, exploited, overworked, underpaid and
discarded. spcaLA was also incorporated
as an spcc (Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children) as we preceded
the enactment of child labor laws and social service programs. In 2011, spcaLA boasts anti-violence programs
for at-risk youth, domestic violence programs to assist those who would risk
their lives not to leave a pet behind and an elite disaster response unit that
travels nationwide to assist animals and their people. These programs are also essential as there is
undisputed evidence that crimes against animals are a predictor and precursor
of crimes against humans. It is us, the
non-profit, who works with those troubled teens. It is our educators who work in the
classrooms and provide age-appropriate humane education curricula to teachers
who would not otherwise have them. We
are just one charity – imagine the impact, scope, and reach of all of us
together.
Corporations and the wealthy that are willing to contribute
to our much needed programs must be allowed to do so at current rates if not at
higher ones. Across the country, charities
that provide meals, shelter, hospital services and the like are now shuttered
due to already existing funding shortages.
With all due respect, this bill would be cutting the last lifeline to
many of us in the non-profit sector. Is
this not contrary to the president’s message asks the “haves” to help provide
for the “have nots”? That is
philanthropy – those with funds fund those without.
The argument that the jobs bill will put more people to work
and therefore will generate more funding for charities is a faulty one. These temporary infrastructure jobs will
indeed provide a helping hand to those who are drowning but they will not
generate the type of financial security that can tolerate charitable contributions.
I ask President Obama not to deprive those that depend upon
the non-for-profit sector for their survival and not to not rob the
philanthropic community to pay America’s debts.
We live in a time where neither Peter nor Paul has anything
else to spare.
I agree. Why do these geniuses frame arguments in an either/or scenario. It is possible to do both. The funding for nonprofits is considered a luxury item. I knew the arts didn't matter; they are held in the hands of the Philistines. But this is ridiculous. We need a Samson to destroy their temple. Words and our cries can help. Keep on writing.
ReplyDelete