
The military is further concerned that the problem will worsen as United Airlines, the airline contracted to transport military personnel, refuses to permit certain breeds of dogs, such as American Staffordshire Terriers, on their planes, and will not waive this restriction for the Defense Department.
While I fully support holding those who choose to have a pet responsible for caring for that pet and accountable to the authorities for not doing so, I would also suggest that the military drop United Airlines and contract with another carrier so those with "banned" family dogs can travel without the additional heartbreak of the loss of a pet or the expense of funding their own flights on another airline. It seems an unnecessary stressor for those who would otherwise not abandon their pet.
In fact, if all pet lovers chose, in sympathy, to fly with different airlines - maybe we would see an attitude change from United.
The president is expected to decide this spring.
Dogs don't concern or interest me at all, and I support the ban on pit bulls, which time after time have been proven to be extremely dangerous, whether genetically or through human intervention is immaterial. But other living beings should definitely be given every care and consideration, and those treating them as less than cherished and valued should never be given the opportunity to care for them.
ReplyDelete"Other living things should be given every care and consideration..." Every living thing deserves care and consideration. I'm not sure what to make of your comment.
ReplyDelete