courtesy Google images |
The time for Congress to pass the farm bill has come and we must make sure that Republican Senator Steve Kings’ amendment, Protect Interstate Commerce Act (PICA), which would strip states of the right to regulate its own agricultural interests by requiring products coming into a state to comply with the standards of that state, is removed from the bill.
For example, the egg producers in Kings’ home state of
Iowa would not have to comply with California’s law that egg farmers give
egg-laying birds room to stand, spread their wings and move around, and that all eggs sold in California must
come from farms that meet California standards.
King assertion that California is the only state that
would be impacted either indicates his ignorance of the issue or his willingness
to misstate the facts to assist his constituent egg producers. The language in
the amendment could not only nullify agricultural protections enacted by individual
states, but, could, according to the Washington Times “have far-reaching implications, nullifying a
large spectrum of state and local laws concerning everything from livestock
welfare to GMO labeling, restrictions on pesticide and antibiotic use, horse
slaughter, child labor, fire safe cigarettes, shark finning, Christmas trees,
and even the sale of cat and dog meat.”
14 law professors from around the country stated in a letter to the legislative conferees that "should the Amendment pass, there is a significant likelihood that many state agricultural laws across the country will be nullified, that public health and safety will be threatened, and that the Amendment could ultimately be deemed unconstitutional.”
14 law professors from around the country stated in a letter to the legislative conferees that "should the Amendment pass, there is a significant likelihood that many state agricultural laws across the country will be nullified, that public health and safety will be threatened, and that the Amendment could ultimately be deemed unconstitutional.”
That said, what happened to the republican platform of
the sanctity of states’ rights? How odd that in the areas of assault weapons, health
care, same sex marriage, abortion and marijuana there is a deafening clamor to
defer to states and block the intrusive federal government from acting. But when
Kings’ constituent egg producers might not be able to sell in California – the republican,
King, is all about running roughshod over the states and the importance of
federal control.
Kings’ position is disappointing and obviously self-serving
as it appears to convey a platform that encourages the discarding of principles,
factual statements and that acts adversely to the best interests of those in vulnerable
positions whether human or animal.
Which party is that?
No comments:
Post a Comment