I am really irritated with Amazon and the Kindle,
As an extremely busy CEO who loves to read but has precious little down time, I use technology to help. Though a devout paper lover - the smell of a newly opened hard covered book is divine - I supplement with technology rather than read less. I therefore owned a Rocket Book - one of the first E readers - which allowed me to travel with numerous texts sans weight, and now I use a kindle, ipad and ipod to read everywhere.
In Los Angeles - this means the car! Hours of traffic and freeways available to a readaholic. To that end I listen to Audible.com books as well as Kindle books through the text to speech option. There is a difference - the former is a performance, sometimes with actors and music, the latter is a computer reading in a monotone. It is impossible to confuse the two. Yet - amazingly, Amazon is allowing publishers to disable the text to speech feature as they feel their Audible.com sales could be threatened.
Nonsense - by that logic I couldn't have the passenger in the car read a book to me, read to my kids or read to the visiually challenged. This is stupid, not legally necessary - yet - Amazon caved to this silly demand.
Really - Amazon needs to grow a pair and support the text to speech option it promised consumers.
A blog by spcaLA president, Madeline Bernstein
Apr 19, 2010
Apr 11, 2010
Just Say No to the Circus
This week a circus trainer in Pennsylvania was killed by an elephant. Another avoidable tragedy. In response to this news, my twitter friend, DrBuzziBoomBatz in essence said to leave the creatures alone and ban all animals from circuses creating more jobs for trapeze artists. An excellent suggestion!
Why do we insist on supporting an industry that shackles, chains, contorts, and breaks wild animals until they submit to wearing rhinestone hats and sitting on a stool. Does anyone think this is ok? Does anyone not know of the long days cramped in train cars, endless hours chained to posts, and grueling "training" sessions topped off by a performance under bright lights, in front of thousands of screaming people which are constantly suffered by elephants, lions, tigers, horses and other circus animals? Does anyone think this is ok? Do we require this form of amusement? Are we still searching for a King Kong to hawk as another wonder of the world and to, of course, make a promoter rich? Does our happiness depend upon an elephant walking on hind legs or a tiger jumping through a ring of fire? I surely hope not. Can our children grow to be fine adults without witnessing this? I surely hope so. Make no mistake. It is not magic. These animals aren't born wanting to perform those tricks. They are forced, hurt, bullied and can't call for help. They have no choice.
We do have a choice. We don't have to watch. If we can't ban animals in circuses - we can ignore the circus to death. If it is no longer profitable to enslave and destroy the spirit or our wild animals - maybe they will go away. Just say no to the circus.
Why do we insist on supporting an industry that shackles, chains, contorts, and breaks wild animals until they submit to wearing rhinestone hats and sitting on a stool. Does anyone think this is ok? Does anyone not know of the long days cramped in train cars, endless hours chained to posts, and grueling "training" sessions topped off by a performance under bright lights, in front of thousands of screaming people which are constantly suffered by elephants, lions, tigers, horses and other circus animals? Does anyone think this is ok? Do we require this form of amusement? Are we still searching for a King Kong to hawk as another wonder of the world and to, of course, make a promoter rich? Does our happiness depend upon an elephant walking on hind legs or a tiger jumping through a ring of fire? I surely hope not. Can our children grow to be fine adults without witnessing this? I surely hope so. Make no mistake. It is not magic. These animals aren't born wanting to perform those tricks. They are forced, hurt, bullied and can't call for help. They have no choice.
We do have a choice. We don't have to watch. If we can't ban animals in circuses - we can ignore the circus to death. If it is no longer profitable to enslave and destroy the spirit or our wild animals - maybe they will go away. Just say no to the circus.
Apr 4, 2010
I Finally Met a Donation I Didn't Want
A friend called me dumbfounded. She was speaking to a person who was planning a vacation, could not find a sitter for the family cats, and did not want to spend the funds to board them. She then announced to my friend that she would do the right thing and "donate" them to a local shelter. She and her children would then get new cats upon their return from vacation. Problem solved.
I realize that not everyone is as immersed in or educated about the animal welfare business as those of us directly involved - but - really? We hope that a commitment is made when adopting a pet that is for the life of the pet and includes food, medical care and boarding when necessary. I understand that people don't always choose the correct words when speaking - but - "donate"? We seek donations to care for and educate about unwanted and abused pets with the hope that someday we won't have anymore of them. I believe that it's commonly felt that providing children with a pet can be an invaluable experience - but - what is the real message to her kids here? That pets are disposable and there are always more? In fact - most children witnessing such behavior wonder if they will be turned in should they become too expensive or inconvenient.
Clearly, we have a lot more work to do. And I finally met a donation I didn't want!
I realize that not everyone is as immersed in or educated about the animal welfare business as those of us directly involved - but - really? We hope that a commitment is made when adopting a pet that is for the life of the pet and includes food, medical care and boarding when necessary. I understand that people don't always choose the correct words when speaking - but - "donate"? We seek donations to care for and educate about unwanted and abused pets with the hope that someday we won't have anymore of them. I believe that it's commonly felt that providing children with a pet can be an invaluable experience - but - what is the real message to her kids here? That pets are disposable and there are always more? In fact - most children witnessing such behavior wonder if they will be turned in should they become too expensive or inconvenient.
Clearly, we have a lot more work to do. And I finally met a donation I didn't want!
Mar 28, 2010
Who Will Care For My Pets When I'm Gone?
The human animal bond runs strong and deep. Our pets are frequently considered part of the family, and, in many cases, the entire family. The concern of what happens if our pet survives us is real and one that can be addressed in an estate plan. Last year, California joined over 35 other states in recognizing enforceable pet trusts as an option for pet owners. Though not perfectly drafted, this law recognizes the unusual status of pets, as beyond their legal designation as property, by permitting them to be beneficiaries of a trust and cared for should the owner die or become incapacitated. Clearly an estate planning attorney will be able to analyze your needs and advise you accordingly. I ask only that you think this through so that your pets are protected and that you have peace of mind.
spcaLA has a pet re-homing program into which you can enroll in advance and leave your pets to us through your will or trust. There are similar programs around the country. If you are leaving your pets to a sanctuary, where your pet will live out his or her life, please investigate first to ensure that your pet will have a good quality of life at that location. If you are choosing to set up a pet trust, provide as much detail as possible as to the the care, feeding, stimulation, needs and habits of your pet including euthanasia issues and disposal of remains. These instructions will make the task easier for the caretaker and trustee as well as ensuring continuity for your pet who will be grieving and dealing with change. They are also essential even if you are leaving your pet with a relative or friend through a traditional will. Please note that when dealing with exotic pets like birds, tortoises, coy etc. you must plan for their life spans which can be much longer than that of humans! A huge estate or great personal wealth is not required to provide for your pets - just thought and attention to the details.
Finally, an emergency plan is essential to cover the event of an accident or gap between death and when it is discovered that there are pets in need.Similar to standard disaster planning we recommend a wallet card with essential info i.e. emergency caretaker, veterinarian etc., a decal on your house/apartment indicating the presence of pets and a pet document with all details discussed above with copies given to all relevant parties and attached to your estate planning documents and important papers.
Planning in advance will make you less dependent on the kindness of strangers, will truly fulfill your pledge to care for your pet for the pets' life and will provide you with the peace of mind of a job well done.
spcaLA has a pet re-homing program into which you can enroll in advance and leave your pets to us through your will or trust. There are similar programs around the country. If you are leaving your pets to a sanctuary, where your pet will live out his or her life, please investigate first to ensure that your pet will have a good quality of life at that location. If you are choosing to set up a pet trust, provide as much detail as possible as to the the care, feeding, stimulation, needs and habits of your pet including euthanasia issues and disposal of remains. These instructions will make the task easier for the caretaker and trustee as well as ensuring continuity for your pet who will be grieving and dealing with change. They are also essential even if you are leaving your pet with a relative or friend through a traditional will. Please note that when dealing with exotic pets like birds, tortoises, coy etc. you must plan for their life spans which can be much longer than that of humans! A huge estate or great personal wealth is not required to provide for your pets - just thought and attention to the details.
Finally, an emergency plan is essential to cover the event of an accident or gap between death and when it is discovered that there are pets in need.Similar to standard disaster planning we recommend a wallet card with essential info i.e. emergency caretaker, veterinarian etc., a decal on your house/apartment indicating the presence of pets and a pet document with all details discussed above with copies given to all relevant parties and attached to your estate planning documents and important papers.
Planning in advance will make you less dependent on the kindness of strangers, will truly fulfill your pledge to care for your pet for the pets' life and will provide you with the peace of mind of a job well done.
Mar 14, 2010
We Must Speak for California Bears
The California Department of Fish & Game (DFG) is proposing to expand Bear Hunting in several horrific ways. They want to increase the number of areas zoned for hunting, remove the limit on the number of kills, allow hounds to wear GPS devices and tip switches, and permit the training of hunting hounds throughout the year. Besides the loss of bears, ancillary animal cruelty, such as the death and injuries to the hunting hounds, the wounding and harming of non targeted animals will also occur.This is a very disappointing move by an agency charged with the protection of our natural wildlife.
What we are really talking about is the following. The hunters first spray a bear attractant on the hounds and attach the GPS device and tip switch to the dog's collar. Then they chit chat in the forest while the dogs hunt the bears. (Many, sustaining fatal injuries by the bears in the process.) When the tip switch lets the hunter know a bear is treed, the hunter follows the GPS signal to the bear and shoots him or her at point blank range. I submit that such a practice is neither hunting nor sport, but rather, nothing more than a canned hunt. In fact - it is shameful, cowardly and cruel to both the bears and the dogs.
Finally, DFG, the Wardens Association and the Commission repeatedly assert a lack of sufficient enforcement resources to perform existing duties. The Wardens Association begged the commission to not enact anything new until they receive more assets and personnel. Expanding bear hunting at a time where there is a current inability to perform existing mandates, is absurd and defies logic. By its own statement, DFG suggests the current practice of writing letters to indicate the early closing of the current hunting season (when the kill limit is reached) is too much work and costs too much in postage! Their solution is to propose killing more bears so no limit would be reached which would eliminate the early closing of the season and the resultant letter writing. This is truly unconscionable.
Finally, most Californians are not hunters and we need to make ourselves heard. Please contact director@dfg.ca.gov and just say no!
What we are really talking about is the following. The hunters first spray a bear attractant on the hounds and attach the GPS device and tip switch to the dog's collar. Then they chit chat in the forest while the dogs hunt the bears. (Many, sustaining fatal injuries by the bears in the process.) When the tip switch lets the hunter know a bear is treed, the hunter follows the GPS signal to the bear and shoots him or her at point blank range. I submit that such a practice is neither hunting nor sport, but rather, nothing more than a canned hunt. In fact - it is shameful, cowardly and cruel to both the bears and the dogs.
Finally, DFG, the Wardens Association and the Commission repeatedly assert a lack of sufficient enforcement resources to perform existing duties. The Wardens Association begged the commission to not enact anything new until they receive more assets and personnel. Expanding bear hunting at a time where there is a current inability to perform existing mandates, is absurd and defies logic. By its own statement, DFG suggests the current practice of writing letters to indicate the early closing of the current hunting season (when the kill limit is reached) is too much work and costs too much in postage! Their solution is to propose killing more bears so no limit would be reached which would eliminate the early closing of the season and the resultant letter writing. This is truly unconscionable.
Finally, most Californians are not hunters and we need to make ourselves heard. Please contact director@dfg.ca.gov and just say no!
Mar 7, 2010
"I Have a Little List" - An Animal Abuse Registry
The concept of an animal abuse registry is to list those convicted of certain animal related felonies on a public website as is done with sex offenders. As animal abuse is a violent act, often a precursor to violence against people, frequently a symptom of problems in children, and always present in the criminal histories of violent felony offenders - it must be taken seriously. It is also critical that in practice, such a registry would protect animals from future abuse, further public safety, and could withstand the necessary constitutional scrutiny to justify the public branding of offenders.
This legislation is, at this moment, a first draft. It raises many questions and, at first blush, seems fraught with the possibility of unintended consequences. For example, this version of the statute mandates that a person convicted of the felony of dog theft be listed on the abuse registry. In other words, one who steals a valuable dog for a resale profit, or, an over zealous animal lover who steals a dog that appears to be mistreated, (illegal but it happens) could be placed on this abuse registry without ever having to abuse the dog. Is this what the author intended? This is just one of a multitude of difficult legal and public policy issues present in this first draft. While the intent of this law is laudable - the actual text must be commensurate with the goal. Otherwise, we are supporting a caption, a bill in name only, while enacting a quandary.
Accordingly, I will be carefully watching the evolution of and amendments to this legislation. Stay tuned!
This legislation is, at this moment, a first draft. It raises many questions and, at first blush, seems fraught with the possibility of unintended consequences. For example, this version of the statute mandates that a person convicted of the felony of dog theft be listed on the abuse registry. In other words, one who steals a valuable dog for a resale profit, or, an over zealous animal lover who steals a dog that appears to be mistreated, (illegal but it happens) could be placed on this abuse registry without ever having to abuse the dog. Is this what the author intended? This is just one of a multitude of difficult legal and public policy issues present in this first draft. While the intent of this law is laudable - the actual text must be commensurate with the goal. Otherwise, we are supporting a caption, a bill in name only, while enacting a quandary.
Accordingly, I will be carefully watching the evolution of and amendments to this legislation. Stay tuned!
Mar 1, 2010
Tormenting Animals is not Entertainment
Are we not over the need to use animals for our entertainment? How many animals must be unnaturally confined and tormented to perform tricks for our pleasure? How many families have to lose a loved one or witness a mauling to sate our need for these spectacles? Greased pigs, dancing bears, performing elephants, acrobatic killer whales, musical monkeys, not to mention caged exotics and novelties such as a surgically altered goat that Ringling Brothers called a unicorn blight our history. It is enough.
We are better than this. We have better means of entertaining ourselves than water shows, circuses, and zoo exhibits. I respectfully submit to you that it is immoral to force a killer whale to swim in a tank instead of the ocean, to ask a giraffe to run around a circular cage rather than 40 miles a day in the wild and to ask an elephant to go crazy in a concrete barn, unable to walk free for our benefit.
We must correct this. Some blithely and naively chant that these animals must immediately be set free in the wild. This too can be a death sentence as we have hand-printed and suppressed the animals' ability to hunt and survive without us. I have a plan. We need to review each species, then each individual animal within that species, and select the best course for each based upon differences in age, health, length in captivity and physical issues (neutered, declawed etc). We then can release where appropriate while simultaneously ceasing to add to the "collections". We then increase and improve habitats for those remaining to maximize mental and physical health with an eye towards redefining the future use of these vast spaces for such centers and parks that will truly educate. For example, the creation of true science centers using computer images, and animatronics placed in simulated natural, interactive, habitats which can mentor a true sense of ethics while demonstrating a real look at native and exotic wildlife. It will take a while, but it is possible.
Come on people. We can, should, and must start this today.
We are better than this. We have better means of entertaining ourselves than water shows, circuses, and zoo exhibits. I respectfully submit to you that it is immoral to force a killer whale to swim in a tank instead of the ocean, to ask a giraffe to run around a circular cage rather than 40 miles a day in the wild and to ask an elephant to go crazy in a concrete barn, unable to walk free for our benefit.
We must correct this. Some blithely and naively chant that these animals must immediately be set free in the wild. This too can be a death sentence as we have hand-printed and suppressed the animals' ability to hunt and survive without us. I have a plan. We need to review each species, then each individual animal within that species, and select the best course for each based upon differences in age, health, length in captivity and physical issues (neutered, declawed etc). We then can release where appropriate while simultaneously ceasing to add to the "collections". We then increase and improve habitats for those remaining to maximize mental and physical health with an eye towards redefining the future use of these vast spaces for such centers and parks that will truly educate. For example, the creation of true science centers using computer images, and animatronics placed in simulated natural, interactive, habitats which can mentor a true sense of ethics while demonstrating a real look at native and exotic wildlife. It will take a while, but it is possible.
Come on people. We can, should, and must start this today.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)