Courtesy washingtonpost.com/google images |
Zoos are no place for animals.
Copenhagen Zoo killed, dissected and fed a giraffe, Marius, to
their big cats while children watched. The zoo asserted that this giraffe,
though healthy, possessed genes too common with the other giraffes in the zoo
to be used in their breeding program. This was done despite both the posting of
online petitions opposing this course of action and the offers of other
facilities to take Marius.
The zoo argued that such
"culling" occurs in the wild and that they have similarly done this
many times with goats, antelope and boar. They further argued that seeing a
giraffe this way was educational for youngsters.
I understand that we are always confronted
with the constant conflicts of choosing between saving the predator or the
prey. Do you let a snake starve because you won't kill a mouse? Such
contradictions exist everywhere in our lives. Criminals can behave kindly, pit
bull fighters can cherish the family pet dog, and people can kill to protect
others. Not every decision is a "Sophie's Choice" but they must all
be recognized as the products of a complex world with competing priorities. The
mouse and the snake each want to live and will fight to do so.
courtesy abc.com/google images |
That said, zoos have educational mandates
and responsibilities to treat their animals and visitors humanely. They should
not exist to replicate the wars in the wild but rather, if they must exist, to
demonstrate compassion, conserve endangered species and teach respect for those
with whom we share this planet.
I don't think wild animals should be held
captive for our entertainment. I surely don't think they should be massacred
for it either.
Originally printed in the Washington Times: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/feb/17/letter-to-the-editor-zoos-should-exhibit-compassio/
Originally printed in the Washington Times: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/feb/17/letter-to-the-editor-zoos-should-exhibit-compassio/
No comments:
Post a Comment